The Firmware Page

It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 3:06 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

What 16x drive is better?
NEC ND-3500A 49%  49%  [ 58 ]
Pioneer DVR-A08XL 51%  51%  [ 61 ]
Total votes : 119
Author Message
 PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:40 pm 
Posting Master
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:54 pm
Posts: 1430
Location: You find me
dvd-x-boy wrote:
Flash, with what 12x media do you talk about?
If you mean 8x@12x then that isn't the same, anyway, i beg to differ. I have consitently found the NEC faster @12x burning to 8x Verb -R.
I do agree with the speeds on the 8x burns themselves, my FUJI03 tests where identical to yours.
Maybe you should look at my DL tests while you are at it.
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Forum/tm.asp?m=75324
:oops: I did make a mistake with that post and I deleted it just as you were posting this query I stand corrected
Its been a long weekend. :oops:

_________________
http://flashman.rpc1.org
http://www.dvd-recordable.org
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:50 pm 
Professional Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:35 am
Posts: 97
Been a long weekend here too, Maybe NEC should have made it clear the Drive only does P-CAV at 16x write speeds, some guy has VERB +R 16x for testing, but i don't know who he knows to have got them, they are not even mentioned as coming soon on any of the VERB web sites.

_________________
Selected Kit list:
1x Pioneer 110
1x Pioneer 110D BLK
2x Pioneer 109
1x NEC 4550
1x Sony DRU700a
1x Toshiba SDM 1712
2x Lite On 16p9s
1x Panasonic DMRE500H
1x Pioneer DVR-K05s


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 4:19 am 
Master Poster

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:25 pm
Posts: 352
chef.... I realize the CDR overburning but was referring to DVD+R overburning... does it support that like the 107 did? I suppose I should have been more clear with my question.


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:49 am 
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 11:39 am
Posts: 23433
Location: .de #...still playing LLAMATRON! # sprite killing around level 138 and higher....
Same info from the Review on cdrinfo.com.

Quote:
- DVD Overburning Tests

Using Nero CD-DVD Speed, we tested if the drive can overburn using DVD+R and DVD-R media. Unfortunately, the drive does not support overburning, giving the following error with all inserted media.

_________________
.:The rpc1.org FAQ:. Please read & follow our firmware request rules precisely! .:The DiscInfo tool:.

I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring DVD-R (A) & HD-DVD media, any size, any brand. Please pm me if you can help. \:D/

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:18 pm 
Master Poster

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:25 pm
Posts: 352
yea I Read that too which led me to wonder why the 108 cant overburn DVD's when the 107 could.

Oh well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:03 pm 
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 11:39 am
Posts: 23433
Location: .de #...still playing LLAMATRON! # sprite killing around level 138 and higher....
For my 108 & Nero 6.3.1.20 Simulation of +R Overburn is currently disabled.
I could try to activate it by disabling Buffer-Underrun-Prevention...
<<<edit>>> Will not work for me anyway. :sad:
Getting the exact same messages that were posted in the review on cdrinfo.com.

Anyway, an extra of approx. 30mb compared with a really damaged or wrecked drive is a bit pointless, IMHO.

_________________
.:The rpc1.org FAQ:. Please read & follow our firmware request rules precisely! .:The DiscInfo tool:.

I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring DVD-R (A) & HD-DVD media, any size, any brand. Please pm me if you can help. \:D/

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:35 pm 
Master Poster

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:25 pm
Posts: 352
I do agree. With this drive being a DL layer overburning won't be necessary as soon as DL media is available. Thanks for looking into it however.

From reading flashes battle of the burners I am getting the impression the pioneer is superior to the NEC minus the fact that the NEC ban burn CD's at a faster rate and read media a little quicker. Anyone else getting this same opinion? Is it worth upgrading from my 107 to the 108?


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:20 am 
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 11:39 am
Posts: 23433
Location: .de #...still playing LLAMATRON! # sprite killing around level 138 and higher....
Cantankerous wrote:
From reading flashes battle of the burners I am getting the impression the pioneer is superior to the NEC minus the fact that the NEC ban burn CD's at a faster rate and read media a little quicker.


I have the same opinion.
But what matters for me is the writing quality and according to Flash's tests the Pioneer drive has won in this category!!

_________________
.:The rpc1.org FAQ:. Please read & follow our firmware request rules precisely! .:The DiscInfo tool:.

I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring DVD-R (A) & HD-DVD media, any size, any brand. Please pm me if you can help. \:D/

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:52 am 
Firmware Patcher

Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 1:47 pm
Posts: 2315
Cantankerous wrote:
I do agree. With this drive being a DL layer overburning won't be necessary as soon as DL media is available. Thanks for looking into it however.

From reading flashes battle of the burners I am getting the impression the pioneer is superior to the NEC minus the fact that the NEC ban burn CD's at a faster rate and read media a little quicker. Anyone else getting this same opinion? Is it worth upgrading from my 107 to the 108?

Where's this battle? This would kinda surprise me since NEC's burning quality has always been quite superior to Pioneer's one recently!


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:53 am 
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 11:39 am
Posts: 23433
Location: .de #...still playing LLAMATRON! # sprite killing around level 138 and higher....
Herrie wrote:
This would kinda surprise me since NEC's burning quality has always been quite superior to Pioneer's one recently!


Herrie, without your patched firmwares & your endless engagement the NEC drives wouldn't be that good in writing quality. :wink:

I personally think the NEC support has improved but it still can be improved though.

_________________
.:The rpc1.org FAQ:. Please read & follow our firmware request rules precisely! .:The DiscInfo tool:.

I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring DVD-R (A) & HD-DVD media, any size, any brand. Please pm me if you can help. \:D/

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:23 am 
Past Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 2:57 pm
Posts: 4258
Location: .ie
Herrie wrote:
Where's this battle? This would kinda surprise me since NEC's burning quality has always been quite superior to Pioneer's one recently!


Herrie,
The preliminary comparative results are here.

I think since NEC and Pioneer are the prime competitors in the DVD burner battle, it makes sense to have a comparison between NEC & Pioneer equivalent models when they come out. (NB: I am NOT saying that other manufacturers are worthless. It only looks to me like, in volume sales, NEC is probably 1st and Pioneer second. But if anybody has actual figures, it'd be interesting to know which manufacturers occupy the top spot)

_________________
>NIL: [I am now retired and no longer browsing these forums]


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:34 pm 
Junior Member

Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:07 pm
Posts: 22
OK in Slovenia I can get a NEC 3500 for about 100$
Very cheap.

But isn't tis drive supposed to be CAV?
And does not that mean, that there is supposed to be no gear switching but constant speed growth instead?

Because inone of those graphs it zays Z-CAV and it changes gears. Isn't that annoying?

Can anyone explain to me which is better? CAV, Z-CAV,.. why, what does it mean for the average recording speed,..

Because those gear changes always messed up my cheapo DVD media since NEC 2500 would not read them back after the point where ggears changed for instance-around 900 Mbs while a Toshiba DVD ROM would.

Cause these gear changes affect writing quality and I am concerned that the same [*Profanity*] will happen again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:04 pm 
Rookie

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 1:33 am
Posts: 7
Bleeder wrote:
But isn't tis drive supposed to be CAV?
And does not that mean, that there is supposed to be no gear switching but constant speed growth instead?


The NEC ND-3500AG does write CAV @ 16x writing only I believe I am not sure of the other speeds, I know for a fact that it uses Z-CAV when writing @ 12x. Here is a CDSpeed image of a test DVD+R using a rebadged NEC ND-3500AG (TDK DVDRW1616N).

:arrow: Burning at 16x with Verbatim 8x DVD+R

:arrow: Time: 6 mins 14s
Image

:arrow: Kprobe scan
Image
:arrow: ThanX [Dave27] for screenshots.
Original Topic: http://forums.hardwarezone.com/showthre ... forumid=73

The NEC drive does CAV but notice the spikes due to WOPC wich calibrates the drive's lens constantly, a plus aside from just OPC. I am pretty impressed mostly because it burns 16x a lot quicker than the Pioneer DVR-A08 and the quality does not seem to be sacrificed, noting that it is an 8x DVD+R being burnt @ 16x.

:twisted: XDi2600 Out...


Last edited by XDi2600 on Wed Aug 18, 2004 11:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:07 pm 
Master Poster

Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 11:33 am
Posts: 196
Location: .uk
ahem.

Pioneer-NEC_04.htm

Pioneer baby! :D :P

_________________
Proud owner of an Pioneer DVR-108, and a not so proud owner of an LG 8161B w/ auto reset firmware


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:59 pm 
Past Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 2:57 pm
Posts: 4258
Location: .ie
Toge

I'm usually considered as a Pioneer boy, but for the sake of being objective, I'd say that the test you linked to would probably have more meaning if Flash had found a media that both drive would have burned at 8x.

One drive burned the disc faster, but the quality was worse
The other drive burned the disc much slower, and the quality was better.

I don't think this tells much.
Much more interesting is when you have a media that takes about the same time to burn in both drives.
Then the PI/PO/Jitter graphs become very revealing...

_________________
>NIL: [I am now retired and no longer browsing these forums]


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:14 pm 
Posting Master
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:54 pm
Posts: 1430
Location: You find me
>NIL: wrote:
I'm usually considered as a Pioneer boy, but for the sake of being objective, I'd say that the test you linked to would probably have more meaning if Flash had found a media that both drive would have burned at 8x.
Pardon!
Did you not see my FIRST TEST?

_________________
http://flashman.rpc1.org
http://www.dvd-recordable.org
Image


Last edited by Flash on Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:24 pm 
Past Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 2:57 pm
Posts: 4258
Location: .ie
OOOPS!!! :oops:

I stand corrected.
I think Toge's link would have been better to this page...

_________________
>NIL: [I am now retired and no longer browsing these forums]


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 6:51 pm 
Professional Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:35 am
Posts: 97
Regardless of what i have read in other peoples tests, i still can not get my NEC 3500 to bit set DL disks to DVD-ROM, the Pioneer does them automatically, if anyone has suceeded in doing so with the NEC could they please send me their firmware.
Thanks.

_________________
Selected Kit list:
1x Pioneer 110
1x Pioneer 110D BLK
2x Pioneer 109
1x NEC 4550
1x Sony DRU700a
1x Toshiba SDM 1712
2x Lite On 16p9s
1x Panasonic DMRE500H
1x Pioneer DVR-K05s


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 9:22 am 
Fresh meat

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:41 am
Posts: 10
Location: Germany
@Flash

You're surely busy like hell with doing all these tests on those two new drives. I really appreciate your work! But now, as you might have guessed, I have a tiny little suggestion. :wink:

Would it be possible to do some high quality +R media test with e.g. RICOHJPNR02, YUDENT002 or Verbatim MCC003 at 8x@12x (Don't know if the current fw allows this. If not, a comparison at 8x only would also be nice though and we'll wait until herrie did his work :wink:)

I consider buying one of these, but most tests to find are made with DVD-R media and I'm really curious about how they compare with +Rs (especially burn-quality wise).

Thanks
chres


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 9:27 am 
Posting Master
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:54 pm
Posts: 1430
Location: You find me
chres wrote:
@Flash
Would it be possible to do some high quality +R media test with e.g. RICOHJPNR02, YUDENT002 or Verbatim MCC003 at 8x@12x (Don't know if the current fw allows this. If not, a comparison at 8x only would also be nice though and we'll wait until herrie did his work :wink:)
No Problem M8 just send me the media you want testing and I will do a full test on it
PM me for my address ;)

_________________
http://flashman.rpc1.org
http://www.dvd-recordable.org
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:37 pm 
Master Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:27 am
Posts: 163
Location: AZ
@XDi2600, I think it is important to link to your sources.
The images were originally posted here: http://forums.hardwarezone.com/showthre ... forumid=73

_________________
NEC questions/problems?
Read my NEC FAQ and troubleshooting guide HERE


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 8:09 pm 
Master Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:27 am
Posts: 163
Location: AZ
@FLASH, I am very confused by your first comparison page.
The media title reads "DATAWRITE FUJIFILM03 8x speed media"
but the MID code block dump reads RITEKG05

Additionally, in the NU PI/PIF test, the MID code is displayed as FUJIFILM03.

What media are you actually testing here???

_________________
NEC questions/problems?
Read my NEC FAQ and troubleshooting guide HERE


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 9:10 pm 
Posting Master
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:54 pm
Posts: 1430
Location: You find me
Wesociety wrote:
@FLASH, I am very confused by your first comparison page.
The media title reads "DATAWRITE FUJIFILM03 8x speed media"
but the MID code block dump reads RITEKG05

Additionally, in the NU PI/PIF test, the MID code is displayed as FUJIFILM03.

What media are you actually testing here???
"DATAWRITE FUJIFILM03 8x speed media" as per the title and the DVDInfo display

:oops: I have just sacked my editor :evil:

_________________
http://flashman.rpc1.org
http://www.dvd-recordable.org
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 9:22 pm 
Master Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:27 am
Posts: 163
Location: AZ
Flash wrote:
:oops: I have just sacked my editor :evil:

hahaha! and who might that editor be?
YOU?! lol
Thanks again for the tests. :wink:

_________________
NEC questions/problems?
Read my NEC FAQ and troubleshooting guide HERE


Top
 Profile  
 
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 11:17 pm 
Rookie

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 1:33 am
Posts: 7
@Wesociety

Thank you for pointing that out, just edited the post :D .


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andyakl and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl